E-Reader News and Reviews

Thoughts on Amazon, Hachette, and publishing in general

I Didn't Buy It on AmazonYesterday’s New York Times had a good article yesterday about Amazon, Hachette, and publishers’ growing concerns about the power that Amazon wields.

I have to tell you I’m feeling very mixed about the whole thing. For one, it’s a little hard to feel outraged that Amazon wants writers to see more of the profit from their books than publishers. On the other hand, Amazon is wielding a very big stick and threatens to do a lot of damage to publishers, and what happens then? I don’t want Amazon to be a monopoly, but they are pretty close.

Still, Amazon has created my favorite product ever in the Kindle. It has improved reading in every way for me. Last week I took a hardback book with me to work so I could finish it up (I do still buy paper from used book stores and my public library). Reading a paper book on the metro was kind of a nightmare. Impossible to turn pages while standing up, clutching a pole, while the train sways to and fro or jerks suddenly to a stop. That, and I couldn’t look words up, highlight quotes I liked, or search for key parts of the book I wanted to remember better.

I’ve said this before, but the Kindle gives me all that, plus an easy, cheap, and fast way to pick up books without filling up my bookshelves at home.

Have I yoked myself to this giant machine in terms of purchasing? Yes, and more than you think, since I buy most of my drugstore items, kitchen items, and pet food on Amazon as well. But if Amazon went away tomorrow I could get those items somewhere else. Not so much for my books. Even the Nook doesn’t seem like it will be around for long.

In light of the Hachette dispute, I told myself I wouldn’t buy Rowling/Galbraith’s The Silkworm from Amazon. I went into a favorite local bookstore (one of very few), and picked up the ten-pound-or-so hardback book, then looked at the cover price of $28. I couldn’t do it, not even on principle. I didn’t want to carry this heavy hardback book, much less read it.

In case you’re wondering, I had an aversion to reading hardback books long before the Kindle came out, but then I was more patient and used to waiting a year for the paperback to come out. Now I get books the day they are released.

So I didn’t buy The Silkworm, even though it’s about $9 on Amazon ($19 on Powells.com and $28 in the stores). I have plenty to read right now, so maybe I’ll wait for the paperback version. Still, I wonder who I’m helping with this little silent protest. I’m not helping Hachette any by NOT buying their book. Amazon certainly isn’t going to notice. And J.K. Rowling won’t either.

I want fairness. I want Amazon not to have all the power and I want publishers to find and support good writing. But as this article points out, publishers aren’t necessarily the good guys either. Amazon has actually made it easier for a lot of people to publish books. Do they see themselves as taking on publishing empires? Or are they just trying to turn a profit, now that they’ve undercut prices for other booksellers.

I admit I’m confused. And I love reading, and my Kindle, too much to do much about it.  What do you think? 

7 thoughts on “Thoughts on Amazon, Hachette, and publishing in general

  1. This is a great post. It’s certainly not an easy argument for anyone….especially if you’re a Kindle user and a regular Amazon shopper. Thank you for sharing your perspective. Now I’m off to share this post.

  2. I am just as torn as you are. I don’t want Amazon to become a monopoly, yet I am not willing to give up the discount prices and fast service. So even though I’d like to complain, I have no right to do so. It will be interesting to see how this situation plays out.

  3. Canadians are notoriously anti-Amazon and we’d be quick to remind you that you can buy many kinds of e-readers other than Amazon and you can buy your e-books from many other outlets as long as you don’t have a Kindle. I think in Canada we tend to root for the little guy, seeing as we are a little guy.

  4. Pingback: KINDLE BOOKS

  5. >Amazon has actually made it easier for a lot of people to publish books.

    I definitely agree with this. I still think the publishing world is loathe to change and continues to pay the price for their reluctance to change their business model.

    I am an Amazonian, but I also use the library and paperbackswap.com a lot! I agree with you about hardcover books–although paperbacks, not e-books, are my favorite medium.

    Interesting post.

  6. Great post, Deb. As a supporter of indie authors — the true “little guy” in this pissing contest — I’m sort of rooting for Hachette to win the right to overcharge consumers for e-books. Let the customer decide whether she wants to pay $12.99 for mediocre new book by an over-the-hill author, or $4.99 for a book that’s good.

  7. I’m so torn on this. On one hand, there was that whole e-book price-fixing debacle a few months back. As a retailer, Amazon should be able to set their own prices, even if it means they’re profit margin is tiny. On the other hand, I get that what publishers do is important.

    I buy a lot of stuff from Amazon because I don’t have a car and Prime shipping is convenient. I love my Kindle for reading on the go, but when I’m at home I still prefer a paperback. I despise hardcovers; they’re nice, but they’re too big to carry around and stupidly overpriced.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s